Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rubber Plantation results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,573 hits. Analysis detected 8,540 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,200 of 37,536 keywords). This Rubber Plantation is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Rubber Plantation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%Rubber Plantation (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos