Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Royalist results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 1,112 hits . Analysis detected 6,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Royalist is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Royalist
Keyword details
Total words: 3,780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 29.4% 29.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 24.9% 24.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst