Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 867 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rotterdam results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 288 hits . Analysis detected 1,612 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,468 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,579 of 37,536 keywords). This Rotterdam is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Rotterdam
Keyword details
Total words: 3,468
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst