Keyword summary
14% 1 analyzed article/video 1,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rommel Delfin Querol results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 479 hits . Analysis detected 1,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 17% (47,010 of 56,617 keywords). This Rommel Delfin Querol is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Rommel Delfin Querol
Keyword details
Total words: 4,376
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst