Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rogue River Wars results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 2,672 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,003 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Rogue River Wars is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Rogue River Wars
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Rogue River Wars (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,003
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos