Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Roger Marshall results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 533 hits. Analysis detected 3,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,716 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Roger Marshall is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Roger Marshall
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Roger Marshall (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,716
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate