Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rockefeller Foundation results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 920 hits . Analysis detected 5,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,225 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,985 keywords). This Rockefeller Foundation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Rockefeller Foundation
Keyword details
Total words: 3,225
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.1% 23.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 28.5% 28.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst