Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Stone results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 1,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,738 of 37,536 keywords). This Robert Stone is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Robert Stone
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
75%Robert Stone (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Middle Ground: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos