Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Shiller results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 302 hits. Analysis detected 2,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,577 of 37,536 keywords). This Robert Shiller is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Robert Shiller
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Robert Shiller (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos