Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Riverside County results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic , Overconfidence Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 192 hits . Analysis detected 1,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,854 of 37,536 keywords). This Riverside County is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. Riverside County
Keyword details
Total words: 2,836
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst