Keyword summary
68%2 analyzed articles/videos1,642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rising Costs results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 762 hits. Analysis detected 4,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,371 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,283 of 37,530 keywords). This Rising Costs is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Rising Costs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
38%Rising Costs (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,371
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate