Keyword summary
89%1 analyzed article/video461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rigged Elections results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 281 hits. Analysis detected 3,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,699 of 37,536 keywords). This Rigged Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Rigged Elections
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%Rigged Elections (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos