Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rigged Election results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 283 hits . Analysis detected 2,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,862 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Rigged Election is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Rigged Election
Keyword details
Total words: 2,862
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst