Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Richard Segovia results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 346 hits . Analysis detected 1,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Richard Segovia is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Richard Segovia
Keyword details
Total words: 3,244
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst