Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Glossip results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 637 hits . Analysis detected 6,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,824 of 37,536 keywords). This Richard Glossip is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group. Richard Glossip
Keyword details
Total words: 14,148
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst