Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Richard Durbin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Recency Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 466 hits . Analysis detected 4,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,504 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This Richard Durbin is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Richard Durbin
Keyword details
Total words: 4,504
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst