Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Childress Racing results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 537 hits. Analysis detected 3,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,137 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (23,171 of 37,536 keywords). This Richard Childress Racing is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Richard Childress Racing
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,137
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510038.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.7%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos