Keyword summary
26%1 analyzed article/video874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rhodium Group results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (40,895 of 56,252 keywords). This Rhodium Group is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Rhodium Group
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
28%Rhodium Group (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510027.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos