Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rhincodon Typus results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 1,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,903 keywords). This Rhincodon Typus is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Rhincodon Typus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Rhincodon Typus (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,704
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos