Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,827 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Retro Computing results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 555 hits . Analysis detected 3,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,072 of 37,536 keywords). This Retro Computing is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Retro Computing
Keyword details
Total words: 7,308
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst