Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rental Subsidies results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Rental Subsidies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Rental Subsidies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Rental Subsidies (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,336
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos