Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renaming Controversy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 464 hits . Analysis detected 3,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,197 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,702 of 37,536 keywords). This Renaming Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Renaming Controversy
Keyword details
Total words: 1,197
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.5% percentile 10.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 38.8% 38.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 23.1% 23.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 24.3% 24.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 18.3% 18.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 38.8%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect: Keyword 29.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst