Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Refinery Regulation results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.8% saturation with 1,275 hits . Analysis detected 4,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,414 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,577 of 37,536 keywords). This Refinery Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Refinery Regulation
Keyword details
Total words: 2,414
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.5% percentile 7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 52.8% 52.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 52.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst