Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Card Penalty results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 250 hits. Analysis detected 2,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (37,206 of 37,420 keywords). This Red Card Penalty is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Red Card Penalty
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
1%Red Card Penalty (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,432
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos