Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Bulls results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 414 hits . Analysis detected 2,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (25,029 of 37,536 keywords). This Red Bulls is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Red Bulls
Keyword details
Total words: 4,536
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst