Keyword summary
80%1 analyzed article/video678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Recruitment Bonus results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 722 hits. Analysis detected 2,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (16,797 of 55,185 keywords). This Recruitment Bonus is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Recruitment Bonus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
70%Recruitment Bonus (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,712
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 26.6%26.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos