Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reconstruction Fund results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 1,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (14,955 of 35,668 keywords). This Reconstruction Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Reconstruction Fund
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
59%Reconstruction Fund (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,128
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos