Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebild National Park Society results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Bandwagon , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 316 hits . Analysis detected 2,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (18,409 of 34,568 keywords). This Rebild National Park Society is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Rebild National Park Society
Keyword details
Total words: 3,168
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst