Keyword summary
75%1 analyzed article/video1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Slaughter results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 645 hits. Analysis detected 5,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,669 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,885 of 37,536 keywords). This Rebecca Slaughter is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Rebecca Slaughter
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%Rebecca Slaughter (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,669
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Straw Man: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos