Keyword summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebates results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 322 hits . Analysis detected 1,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,674 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,903 of 37,536 keywords). This Rebates is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. Rebates
Keyword details
Total words: 1,674
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.6% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst