Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video464 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Real Time With Bill Maher results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 2,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (5,830 of 35,444 keywords). This Real Time With Bill Maher is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Real Time With Bill Maher
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
84%Real Time With Bill Maher (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.6% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.1%18.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.1%14.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos