Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reading Guide results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 974 hits . Analysis detected 4,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,527 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,543 of 37,536 keywords). This Reading Guide is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Reading Guide
Keyword details
Total words: 4,527
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.6% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 21.5% 21.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst