Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rate Bowl results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 858 hits . Analysis detected 7,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,848 of 37,536 keywords). This Rate Bowl is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Rate Bowl
Keyword details
Total words: 3,396
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.8% percentile 7.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 24.1% 24.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 25.3% 25.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 19.5% 19.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst