Keyword summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video2,286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raspberry Pi results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 2,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,858 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (34,448 of 34,833 keywords). This Raspberry Pi is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Raspberry Pi
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠2%Raspberry Pi (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,858
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751001.1% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos