Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raqqa results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 51.1% saturation with 1,316 hits . Analysis detected 6,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,574 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,313 of 36,191 keywords). This Raqqa is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Raqqa
Keyword details
Total words: 2,574
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.6% percentile 9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 51.1% 51.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 28.3% 28.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 27.5% 27.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 51.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 27.5%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst