Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rapid Response Line results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 917 hits. Analysis detected 6,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,062 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (11,206 of 37,536 keywords). This Rapid Response Line is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Rapid Response Line
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
71%Rapid Response Line (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,062
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510070.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.7%12.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate