Keyword summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Range Rover results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,193 hits . Analysis detected 11,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,111 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,704 of 37,533 keywords). This Range Rover is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Range Rover
Keyword details
Total words: 13,111
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst