Keyword summary
7% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Randolph Mantooth results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 401 hits . Analysis detected 2,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,750 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (33,629 of 36,902 keywords). This Randolph Mantooth is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Randolph Mantooth
Keyword details
Total words: 5,750
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst