Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ramah Day Camp Cheltenham Closure results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 1,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Ramah Day Camp Cheltenham Closure is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ramah Day Camp Cheltenham Closure
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos