Keyword summary
84%1 analyzed article/video1,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Railways results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 554 hits. Analysis detected 3,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,705 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (17,720 of 34,832 keywords). This Railways is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Railways
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
50%Railways (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,705
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos