Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rail Car results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 544 hits . Analysis detected 3,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Rail Car is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Rail Car
Keyword details
Total words: 5,300
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst