Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rae Huang results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 3,730 hits. Analysis detected 21,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,672 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (32,550 of 37,533 keywords). This Rae Huang is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Rae Huang
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠14%Rae Huang (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 24,672
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles24.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos