Keyword summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial Slur results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 469 hits . Analysis detected 2,701 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,125 of 37,536 keywords). This Racial Slur is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Racial Slur
Keyword details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst