Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos4,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Race In Public Policy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,324 hits. Analysis detected 12,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (28,902 of 34,923 keywords). This Race In Public Policy is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Race In Public Policy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
18%Race In Public Policy (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 18,304
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510017.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles18.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos