Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Qantas results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 3,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,924 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Qantas is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Qantas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Qantas (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,924
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos