Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Protected Species results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 433 faulty-reasoning hits from 936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,832 keywords). This Protected Species is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Protected Species
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Protected Species (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 936
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles936 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos