Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Prosecutorial Misconduct results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 1.8% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 5,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,821 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,208 keywords). This Prosecutorial Misconduct is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Prosecutorial Misconduct
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Prosecutorial Misconduct (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 26,821
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles26.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos