Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Project Obsidian results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 43.7% saturation with 901 hits. Analysis detected 2,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (4,656 of 35,665 keywords). This Project Obsidian is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Project Obsidian
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠87%Project Obsidian (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,060
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.9% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 43.7%43.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Keyword 43.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos