Keyword summary
85%3 analyzed articles/videos3,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Project Hail Mary results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 2,586 hits. Analysis detected 17,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,803 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,785 of 37,536 keywords). This Project Hail Mary is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Project Hail Mary
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%Project Hail Mary (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 13,803
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 18.7%18.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.2%16.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos