Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Progressive Challengers results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 160 hits . Analysis detected 1,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 785 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,721 of 37,536 keywords). This Progressive Challengers is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Progressive Challengers
Keyword details
Total words: 785
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.8% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles785 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.4% 20.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst